By Hans C. Wahl, Esq.
In a prior post, this blawg discussed the legal claims a seller of real estate can bring against a buyer when that buyer breaches the real estate sales contract. A buyer, on the other hand, also has various legal and equitable claims against the seller of real estate when the seller is unable to convey marketable title or if the seller has a duty to disclose certain defects but fails to make those disclosures. When the seller breaches, the buyer’s claims will largely depend upon the terms of the sales contract, along with the buyer’s underlying goals. This blawg post will describe the various legal actions that buyers of real estate can bring against a seller when that seller breaches the real estate sales contract. Read Full Post
By Hans C. Wahl, Esq.
Before entering into a contract to sell a piece of real estate to a prospective buyer, a seller is obligated to disclose certain things to the buyer. When the seller fails to make those proper disclosures, the buyer has available several legal and equitable remedies that he or she can bring against that seller. This is because, under Florida law, a seller’s failure to disclose certain conditions is considered a breach of the real estate sales contract. But a seller does not always have a duty to disclose, meaning the buyer is still subject to the doctrine of caveat emptor in some situations. This blawg post discusses when the seller of real estate is under a duty to disclose, what the seller is required to disclose and under what circumstances the seller has no obligation to disclose. Read Full Post
In Florida, design-build contracts do not need to identify a licensed architect . This rule was clarified in the recent case of first impression, Diaz & Russell Corporation, et al. v. Dept. of Business and Professional Regulation, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8113, No. 3D13-1764 (Fla. 3d DCA May 28, 2014). An exception in Section 481.229(3), Florida Statutes, allows contractors to “negotiate” design-build contracts, so long as the negotiating contractor is neither offering to render, nor actually rendering, the architectural services of the project. Read Full Post
By: Brent T. Zimmerman, Esq. and Mark F. Moss, J.D. 2015
This is the final submission in a series of bLAWg posts dedicated specifically to explaining delay damages. This series has covered these damages from beginning to end. From successfully proving that a delay occurred, while addressing common defenses and discussing the various methods used to calculate delay damages (Part III, IV, V, VI, VII and VIII). All of this information is applicable to all construction contracts, but there are additional concerns and methods applicable to federal construction contracts. This final post will examine the special considerations and methods of calculating damages that are commonly associated with federal construction contracts.
Read Full Post
By: Brent T. Zimmerman, Esq. and Brandon C. Meadows, J.D.
Design Professionals, such as architects and engineers, may be subject to malpractice actions arising from their performance of professional services. The Florida statute of limitations for professional malpractice claims is two years. Unlike other professionals in Florida, design professionals may also be subject to causes of action arising from services rendered in the design or planning of construction projects. The limitations period for actions arising out of the design, planning or construction of an improvement to real property is four years. Due to the nature of their profession, design professionals will inevitably face the apparent conflict between the two limitations periods. Whether you are pursuing or defending an action against a design professional arising from a construction project in Florida, understanding which limitation period applies is critical. Read Full Post
By: Hans C. Wahl, Esq. A crucial section of the Florida Condominium Act, which directly and significantly affects the assessment revenue and yearly budget for all associations, is Section 718.116(1)(b), Florida Statutes. That section has become known as the first … Read Full Post
As is evident from the previous posts of this series, delay damages are complex. This is Part VIII of the series dedicated specifically to explaining these damages. Previous posts in the series have discussed proving that a delay occurred, addressed the most applicable and common defenses and varying methods to calculate delay damages—the Total Cost Method, the Modified Total Cost Method, the Jury Verdict Method, the Eichleay Formula and damages for an increase in labor, material and equipment costs. This post will discuss two methods that award damages for either a total or partial loss of labor productivity. Read Full Post
Construction contracts contain many risk-shifting mechanisms. One such mechanism is the “pay when paid” provision that requires payment from one party before there is any requirement to pay another party. Typically, this contract provision is found in the contract between the general contractor and its subcontractors, as well as in the subcontractor’s contract with its subcontractors. If not properly worded, this risk shifting provision will not have its intended consequences. Read Full Post
It is not a situation that sellers of real property want to find themselves in, but it is a situation that could easily happen to anyone. After months of hard work getting a property in pristine condition to lure prospective purchasers, and then finally procuring a buyer, the entire transaction suddenly unravels. Despite signing the real estate sales contract, the buyer decides to walk away or, worse yet, fails to show at closing. What is the seller to do? This bLAWg post will discuss that very scenario and describe the legal actions that sellers of real estate can bring against a buyer when the buyer breaches the real estate sales contract. Read Full Post
Statutory guidance for judicial dissolution under Florida’s Revised Limited Liability Company Act is found within Florida Statutes, § 605.0702. Notably the section was revised in June of 2013 and became effective as of January 1, 2014. The revised LLC act, commonly referred to as the “New LLC Act,” significantly modified the judicial dissolution procedure. The New Act clarifies the grounds for judicial dissolution and the appointment of receivers and custodians in the dissolution process. The New LLC Act eliminated a creditor’s right to petition the court for dissolution, added three more bases for dissolution upon petition by a manager or member, and now permits a “deadlock sale provision.” Fortunately, 2014 will be a “transition year” where existing LLC’s may elect to have the new rules apply to them, while all LLCs formed in 2014 will follow the provisions of the New LLC Act. Existing LLC’s are not bound by the New Act until January 1, 2015. Whether you are a member or manager of a newly formed LLC or an existing LLC, the New LLC Act will likely effect your dissolution process. The following bLAWg post will explain what you will need to know about the judicial dissolution process under the New LLC Act as well as practicable issues in winding down a dissolved LLC. Read Full Post